sunny1000
08-06 01:35 PM
Read this below pdf
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/B5eng.pdf
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/B5eng.pdf
wallpaper Wedding Hairstyles 2009/2010
i99
03-27 06:29 PM
Unfortunately, no. 3 months after the receipt notice (it happened to us).
Blog Feeds
09-08 09:40 AM
The Migration Policy Institute has released a report outlining the impact of the global downturn on the movement of immigrants. Key findings include the following: � The recession has dampened the movement of economic migrants to the major immigrant-receiving regions of the world. And, counter to some widely held public perceptions, immigrants overwhelmingly are choosing to stay put in their adopted countries rather than return home despite higher unemployment and lack of jobs. � While the overall picture is one of sharp remittance decline, some regions are experiencing remittance increases or are holding steady. Though remittances have dropped globally amid...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/mpi-recession-impacting-global-migration-patterns.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/mpi-recession-impacting-global-migration-patterns.html)
2011 Tags: 2009 Black Wedding
Blog Feeds
10-23 09:20 AM
As a recent post by an immigration colleague notes, quite a brouhaha has erupted within the immigration bar and among purveyors of immigration case management software over a new outbreak of immigration singularity. The fuss this time involves an electronic form (the new G-28). Beginning October 30, a paper printout of a completed and signed "e-G-28" must be presented to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) every time a lawyer or an accredited nonprofit enters a "notice of entry of appearance" in order to represent a person or entity before the agency. The paper form G-28 has been in use...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2009/10/usciss-rugged-immigration-individualism-defies-the-rule-of-law.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2009/10/usciss-rugged-immigration-individualism-defies-the-rule-of-law.html)
more...
caydee
07-14 08:35 PM
Did IV collect names Tel # of the participants of this rally?
Yes, during registration. All participants were asked to register before the rally........
Yes, during registration. All participants were asked to register before the rally........
Blog Feeds
06-25 01:30 PM
I'm actually writing this blog post on an airplane with Internet access. That's a first for me and those of you who know how much I love technology can probably envision the smile on my face. Back to the post, however. This is really remarkable. Fox News has championed the most hostile antis out there. So when New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Fox owner Rupert Murdoch showed up on the popular Fox and Friends yesterday to explain why we need comprehensive immigration reform, that had to make major waves at the network. The appearance was noted in a major...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/06/rupert-murdoch-takes-proimmigration-case-to-his-own-fox-news.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/06/rupert-murdoch-takes-proimmigration-case-to-his-own-fox-news.html)
more...
pd_recapturing
04-10 08:56 AM
Guys, My labor was moved to Dallas Backlog center and got approved in 2006. When I searched its detail in files from flcdatacenter.com, I could not find any labor that matches my ETA number. I am not sure if there is any way to get the details. Though, online status site of Dallas backlog center shows the status but without any usable details. My labor's ETA number starts with D-xxxxx-xxxxx. Does any body has similar ETA number ?
2010 Best Bridal Hairstyles
iamhopeful
05-24 02:10 PM
Hi,
My 6 yr H1B expires Dec 15,2009. I had applied for labor in 2008 and have received the case number for the labor dated June 26, 2008. My labor is not yet approved and online the status shows "pending". The company has not got any RFE against the labor. I dont know why its taking so much time. My main concern is, Can I apply for h1B extension on the basis of "Pending" Labor approval. What is the time frame to apply for an H1B extension? How long is the extension granted for ? 1 yr or 3 yrs....
Please advise ....
Thank You
My 6 yr H1B expires Dec 15,2009. I had applied for labor in 2008 and have received the case number for the labor dated June 26, 2008. My labor is not yet approved and online the status shows "pending". The company has not got any RFE against the labor. I dont know why its taking so much time. My main concern is, Can I apply for h1B extension on the basis of "Pending" Labor approval. What is the time frame to apply for an H1B extension? How long is the extension granted for ? 1 yr or 3 yrs....
Please advise ....
Thank You
more...
Blog Feeds
05-03 08:40 AM
Reform Immigration For America reports that 500,000 people participated in May Day protests at 80 events around the country. I was attending my 20th law school reunion this weekend in Chicago so took the opportunity to attend the event in the Windy City. The crowd was enthusiastic with lots of signs criticizing SB1070 and calling for immigration reform. And lots of US flags .
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/05/half-million-protest-arizona-law.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/05/half-million-protest-arizona-law.html)
hair wedding hairstyles » 2009 »
Knicker
02-09 03:54 PM
Hi
I came to US on L1 in 2005 thru COMPANY-A and then applied for H1B thru COMPANY-B in 2006 and got approval under 2007 CAP. But I didn't start working for COMPANY-B(H1B) and went to India after H1B approval but came to US on L1B again to continue my work with COMPANY-A(Did a leapfrog).
In 2009 I transferred my H1B from COMPANY-B to COMPANY-C and got the petition approval. So I have a valid H1B petition with COMPANY-C.
In the same year my COMPANY-A(L1B holder) applied for COS to H1B under new 2010 CAP and got approval. So my status has been changed from L1 to H1B with COMPANY-A.
Now I have 2 approved valid petitions, one with COMPANY-A and the other with COMPANY-C, my question is if I get an offer from COMPANY-C can I start working with them with out any H1 transfer application ?
or can I transfer my H1B from COMPANY-C to another COMPANY-D ?
Thanks for your help,
Nick.
I came to US on L1 in 2005 thru COMPANY-A and then applied for H1B thru COMPANY-B in 2006 and got approval under 2007 CAP. But I didn't start working for COMPANY-B(H1B) and went to India after H1B approval but came to US on L1B again to continue my work with COMPANY-A(Did a leapfrog).
In 2009 I transferred my H1B from COMPANY-B to COMPANY-C and got the petition approval. So I have a valid H1B petition with COMPANY-C.
In the same year my COMPANY-A(L1B holder) applied for COS to H1B under new 2010 CAP and got approval. So my status has been changed from L1 to H1B with COMPANY-A.
Now I have 2 approved valid petitions, one with COMPANY-A and the other with COMPANY-C, my question is if I get an offer from COMPANY-C can I start working with them with out any H1 transfer application ?
or can I transfer my H1B from COMPANY-C to another COMPANY-D ?
Thanks for your help,
Nick.
more...
Blog Feeds
04-26 11:30 AM
The eyes of many Americans have focused of late upon the absurdly harsh consequences that immigration law inflicts on people after they have satisfied comparatively modest penalties imposed under the criminal laws. The New York Times' Linda Greenhouse (who has followed the Supreme Court for many years) notes correctly in a recent blog posting that "today�s harshly anti-immigrant legal regime applies not only to the undocumented, but to permanent legal residents as well." While recognizing that immigration law is largely a creature of statute, Greenhouse worries that in "this nation of immigrants and their descendants, we have become so obsessed...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/04/economic-prosperity-the-missing-immigration-mission.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/04/economic-prosperity-the-missing-immigration-mission.html)
hot updo wedding hairstylesquot;,
iinfotech10
08-04 03:44 AM
The Diversity Immigrant Visa program is a United States congressionally-mandated lottery program for receiving a United States Permanent Resident Card. It is also known as the Green Card Lottery. The lottery is administered on an annual basis by the Department of State and conducted under the terms of Section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Section 131 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-649) amended INA 203 to provide for a new class of immigrants known as "diversity immigrants" (DV immigrants). The Act makes available 50,000[1] permanent resident visas annually to persons from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States.
__________________________________________________ ____
link building service (http://www.google-seo-top.com)
hearing school (http://www.swardeep.org)
__________________________________________________ ____
link building service (http://www.google-seo-top.com)
hearing school (http://www.swardeep.org)
more...
house Wedding Hair amp; Hairstyles
itsmesabby
07-19 03:18 AM
Regarding coming back on F1 after being on H4... You should really consider talking to an attorney. With F1 visa you need to prove that you would come back to India at the time of stamping, but with your spouse being on H1 and in states.. how do you thing you can prove that you will come back to India when your spouse is in the states..
tattoo 2009-wedding-hairstyles-4
pappu
11-09 10:45 AM
http://www.legalactioncenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/lac/Badrawi-amicus-brief.pdf
more...
pictures Wedding Hairstyles – Wedding
senk1s
10-16 06:40 PM
Check in the Work/Travel options after 485 sub-forum:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=77
here is a related thread
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14515
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=77
here is a related thread
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14515
dresses Prom hairstyles 2009 pictures
sweet_jungle
06-17 01:52 AM
No replies. So dropping idea of getting Business Credit Cards - perhaps it is not important at this stage.
Yes, I did get a business checkin card. Credit card, I guess, I can get only when the EIN number develops some history. Do you already have a business checking card?
Yes, I did get a business checkin card. Credit card, I guess, I can get only when the EIN number develops some history. Do you already have a business checking card?
more...
makeup Pictures Of Wedding Hairstyles
Head2GC
02-08 05:17 PM
My company filed a new PERM application recently. I have a EB3 I-140 approved from my old employer ( Approved in August 2009). My attorney had filed the new PERM and requested to capture the same date. Will this cause any problems? Below is the question that is asked in ETA9089 form.
1. Are you seeking to utilize the filing date from a previously submitted application for Alien Employment Certification (ETA 750) ?
Did anybody had come across this issue. Your feedback is appreciated.
1. Are you seeking to utilize the filing date from a previously submitted application for Alien Employment Certification (ETA 750) ?
Did anybody had come across this issue. Your feedback is appreciated.
girlfriend formal ridal hairstyles.
indianabacklog
04-14 10:31 AM
Your post raises so many questions it is hard to know where to start.
The obvious one is if you do not have an employer, how have you got an H1B visa since it is the employer who petitions for it?
Second thought, where are you right now? Still in your own country or the USA?
In response to your question about a green card. If you are going to follow the employment based route, by definition, you are going to need an employer to get this process rolling. Starting with PERM labor certification.
The obvious one is if you do not have an employer, how have you got an H1B visa since it is the employer who petitions for it?
Second thought, where are you right now? Still in your own country or the USA?
In response to your question about a green card. If you are going to follow the employment based route, by definition, you are going to need an employer to get this process rolling. Starting with PERM labor certification.
hairstyles top wedding hairstyles 2009
medococo
02-17 02:22 PM
hi all
iam 2007dv winner
got my interview 3 months ago
my case pending administrative process .............
i dont know what to do
any advice or any thing i can do about this ?????????????:(
iam 2007dv winner
got my interview 3 months ago
my case pending administrative process .............
i dont know what to do
any advice or any thing i can do about this ?????????????:(
Blog Feeds
04-01 10:40 AM
Our friendly anti Jack has provided in the comments a couple of links to an intriguing story regarding Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele (currently embroiled in another scandal - this time involving strippers and GOP money - oy!). Steele has been one of the moderate voices in the GOP when it comes to immigration reform in the past and apparently he met with a pro-reform group called the Fair Immigration Reform Movement (FIRM). Accounts differ regarding whether Steele promised to work for immigration reform and, more specifically, help round up a second GOP Senator to sponsor the reform bill...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/gop-head-sort-of-promises-to-support-cir.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/gop-head-sort-of-promises-to-support-cir.html)
Macaca
03-08 09:19 AM
senate panel on Hold
Who Stalled the Intelligence Bill? (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/07/AR2007030702461.html)
Thursday, March 8, 2007
For what could become the third year in a row, the Senate on Tuesday evening did not pass an Intelligence Authorization Bill, over the objection of a lone Republican senator whose name is being protected by his colleagues.
John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, called the delay "one of the more embarrassing efforts I have been associated with in my 24 years in this body." The panel's vice chairman, Sen. Christopher S. Bond (R-Mo.), took the Senate floor Tuesday and called on "any person who has a hold on this bill to come forward and find out what is in the bill."
Rockefeller and Bond have been working over several months to meet objections to items in the bill that the committee passed last May. With changes that Rockefeller and Bond worked out, the measure was reintroduced Jan. 27 and put on the unanimous consent calendar on Feb. 8.
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, was named by Congressional Quarterly yesterday as the member who put the bill on hold. A DeMint spokesman said the senator's office "does not comment on holds," but other congressional sources said that DeMint was the one.
Those sources said that they believe the hold is due to White House objections to specific provisions, including public disclosure of the national intelligence budget; a requirement for a report on secret CIA prisons; and response to information requests by the committee chairman and vice chairman within 30 days.
"We have to be able to pass authorization bills if we are to have an impact on the intelligence community," Bond said.
Who Stalled the Intelligence Bill? (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/07/AR2007030702461.html)
Thursday, March 8, 2007
For what could become the third year in a row, the Senate on Tuesday evening did not pass an Intelligence Authorization Bill, over the objection of a lone Republican senator whose name is being protected by his colleagues.
John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, called the delay "one of the more embarrassing efforts I have been associated with in my 24 years in this body." The panel's vice chairman, Sen. Christopher S. Bond (R-Mo.), took the Senate floor Tuesday and called on "any person who has a hold on this bill to come forward and find out what is in the bill."
Rockefeller and Bond have been working over several months to meet objections to items in the bill that the committee passed last May. With changes that Rockefeller and Bond worked out, the measure was reintroduced Jan. 27 and put on the unanimous consent calendar on Feb. 8.
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, was named by Congressional Quarterly yesterday as the member who put the bill on hold. A DeMint spokesman said the senator's office "does not comment on holds," but other congressional sources said that DeMint was the one.
Those sources said that they believe the hold is due to White House objections to specific provisions, including public disclosure of the national intelligence budget; a requirement for a report on secret CIA prisons; and response to information requests by the committee chairman and vice chairman within 30 days.
"We have to be able to pass authorization bills if we are to have an impact on the intelligence community," Bond said.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий